[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-06 Thread Steve Long
Christian Faulhammer wrote: Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name. One needs exceptions for all kind of systems, for example I had to workaround Trac which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-06 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:43:12PM +0100, Steve Long wrote: Christian Faulhammer wrote: Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name. One needs exceptions

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-06 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Faulhammer wrote: Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name. One needs exceptions

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-06 Thread Markus Ullmann
Alec Warner schrieb: I think the question isn't 'why is this functionality being made available'; I think to me it is useful piece of code. I question its inclusion in the PM though; I would rather see it in eutils or something similar. Arguably you could inherit a function from eutils

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-05 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]: David Leverton wrote: 2008/9/4 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * The 'unpack' helper function recognizes ;sf=tbz2 and ;sf=tgz extensions, for interoperability with gitweb. * SRC_URI supports a syntax extension which allows customization of output