Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
What I propose is to copy licenses/GPL-2 to license/GPL-2+ and adding the
following notes at the start of the two files:
GPL-2:
Note: this license states that the software is licensed under GNU General
Public License version 2, and you might not be able to
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 22:54, Steve Long wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I know that I'm a bit late on this, but to me the version 2 or later is
a license by itself. Let's call it GPL-RENEW and let the file have
contents like:
This package is licensed with the version x or later clause
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Comments, ideas, proposals?
currently we have all those under GPL-2. Now when GPL-3 becomes available
people have the option to use GPL-3. However that will still allow people
to use GPL-2 if their patents, etc need it. SO it is not much difference.
The big
