[gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrice: arch team perspective

2006-06-09 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Stephen P. Becker wrote: Starting a new thread here for a new angle... As Stuart mentioned, bugs for any ebuild on o.g.o would go through Gentoo bugzilla. Yeah, as there is usually a bug report for maintainer-wanted and maintainer-needed bugs it wont hurt anyone. It seems like genstef and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrice: arch team perspective

2006-06-09 Thread Stephen P. Becker
Where else would these bugs go except for arch teams, seeing as we clearly can't assign them to end users who originally submitted the maintainer-wanted ebuilds? These are not expected to be filed as bugs, they should be fixed by the users in question. Apparently, this is not the case.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrice: arch team perspective

2006-06-09 Thread Stuart Herbert
On 6/9/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apparently, this is not the case. Policy for overlays.gentoo.org stipulates that all bugs in overlays must use our bugzilla. The intention of the policy is to prevent the use of third-party bug trackers for tracking problems w/ ebuilds in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrice: arch team perspective

2006-06-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:35 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: It seems like genstef and jokey have completely ignored support from arch teams for this overlay. What are you proposing with respect to arch keywords and package.mask? users are supported to do everything themselves in the