On Tuesday 26 July 2005 00:27, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
One more thing. has_version would not necessarily detect the version we
are upgrading from (i.e., the version that will be removed after
installation) if there is a slotted package. Could that become a
problem?
The portage that this will
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing something.
Does this cover the
- If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 046 ...
- If you are
On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing something.
Does this cover the
- If you are
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing something.
Does this cover the
- If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 046 ...
- If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 050 ...
- If
maillog: 23/07/2005-15:04:06(+0900): Jason Stubbs types
On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:34, Alec Warner wrote:
In order to receive this helpful data we basically need 4 or 5 things.
RESTRICT=Warning
pkg_warn()
Features=Warning
PORTAGE_WARNLEVEL={0-5} ( in make.conf )
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
R Hill wrote:
Craig Lawson wrote:
Comments?
This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
workable. I was hoping some of the developers, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
R Hill wrote:
Craig Lawson wrote:
Comments?
This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
workable. I was hoping some of the developers, if
Craig Lawson wrote:
Comments?
This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
workable. I was hoping some of the developers, if they have a moment,
could consider and critique these suggestions so
