[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Josh Saddler wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: Josh Saddler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer wrote: [. . .] Define contributors -- is this a special status? If it is, how does one *become* a contributor to get these rights? This is potentially a big

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 04 September 2006 02:45, Stefan Schweizer wrote: Josh Saddler wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: [. . .] Define contributors -- is this a special status? If it is, how does one *become* a contributor to get these rights? This is potentially a big

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer wrote: they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing problems .. The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status, only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 04 September 2006 04:32, Stefan Schweizer wrote: they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing problems .. of course they are defined by their status ... you cant go handing out bugzilla access to joe blow because he contributed something The status is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Alec Warner
Josh Saddler wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing problems .. The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status, only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed. -stefan Because as much as