Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 16:17, Peter wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't | > > > > particularly helpful > > > > It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about > > what is

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-14 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:34:16 -0400: > Abusing loopholes in the rules doesn't make something "right". Agreed. However, it then points out the need for a rules change. >> Meanwhile, the Project Sunrise overlay /is/ a

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-14 Thread Duncan
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:09:03 +0100: > The rules call for a GLEP for any wide ranging change. And funnily > enough, they do so to avoid exactly the kind of mess that Sunrise is. Point valid. -- Duncan - List replies

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-14 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:17:57 -0400 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's no such proof. Anyone who rolls a kernel, takes the time to learn > what it entails, understands what he/she is intending to do, knows the > ramifications of those actions. Gentoo users, in particular, by > virtue of the fa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread David Morgan
On 16:17 Tue 13 Jun , Peter wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't | > > particularly helpful > > > > It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about > > what is best for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Jon Portnoy
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:17:57PM -0400, Peter wrote: > It's no such proof. Anyone who rolls a kernel, takes the time to learn > what it entails, understands what he/she is intending to do, knows the > ramifications of those actions. Gentoo users, in particular, by virtue of > the fact that this i

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Peter
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't | > particularly helpful > > It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about > what is best for their system, and utterly clueless about how using