Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-21 Thread Petteri Räty
Richard Freeman kirjoitti: > > How is having a line that states EAPI=foo in the ebuild any less trivial > than putting a -foo at the end of the filename? If anything the latter > is more typing - since the EAPI=foo line would probably be in skel.ebuild... > EAPI=foo is already in skel.ebuild bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-21 Thread Richard Freeman
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:48:31 + > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Point is that your filename format restricts it in exactly the same >> manner. So let's just stick with the use cases which /that/ supports, >> which can more easily be supported with the original

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:48:31 + Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Point is that your filename format restricts it in exactly the same > manner. So let's just stick with the use cases which /that/ supports, > which can more easily be supported with the original design and the > simple restr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Fernando J. Pereda
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:12:24PM +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:48:31 Steve Long wrote: > > >> (optimising early here seems silly tbh, given that paludis now > > >> requires ruby.) > > > > > > Eh? Now what're you on about? > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:48:31 Steve Long wrote: > >> (optimising early here seems silly tbh, given that paludis now > >> requires ruby.) > > > > Eh? Now what're you on about? > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198864 So here you're showing that you don't know what a USE flag is? -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Richard Brown
On Dec 20, 2007 12:48 PM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:07:35 + > > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> (optimising early here seems silly tbh, given that paludis now > >> requires ruby.) > > > > Eh? Now what're you on about? >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:07:35 + > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Do you think a generated EAPI is a good idea? I'm curious as to >> how that would be reflected in the filename (as well as your reasons >> ofc.) > > I'm suggesting that if EAPI is a variable, the