Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass

2005-11-23 Thread Jakub Moc
23.11.2005, 22:14:31, Duncan wrote: [irrelevant twaddle omitted] > It may be possible to automate code creation, but it's not possible to > automate a community, and humans in such a community /don't/ tend to stay > strictly on topic. That's just the way humans are, and have been for far > longe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass

2005-11-23 Thread Ned Ludd
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 14:14 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Chris Gianelloni posted > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on > Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:29:15 -0500: > > > On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 13:06 -0700, Duncan wrote: > >> From an outside perspective, I'm sure it's amazing and crass that USians > >> see no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass

2005-11-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:14:31 -0700 Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | It may be possible to automate code creation, but it's not possible to | automate a community This list is not about making a 'community'. It's about getting development done. If you want to go and make lots of noise about comm

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass

2005-11-23 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:29:15 -0500: > On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 13:06 -0700, Duncan wrote: >> From an outside perspective, I'm sure it's amazing and crass that USians >> see nothing unusual about the national holiday of thanks being direct