On Sunday 25 March 2007, »Q« wrote:
> "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Closing INVALID is like saying they never had an issue - when clearly
> > they did have an issue, even if it was just an issue of understanding.
>
> If bugs.gentoo.org users think that it's like saying there's no
Duncan wrote:
> As one who was offended when one of my first bugs got INVALIDated...
>
I know the feeling, mate :)
> NOTABUG would have been better. It may suffer some of the same issues,
> but is better, and at least here, wouldn't have the discouraging
> connotations due to the minor variation
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:27:11 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do others think of NULL or VOID vs. NOTABUG vs. INVALID?
I'd object against NULL or VOID, they don't make much sense to me.
NOTABUG seems to be the best fit as it's very specific and doesn't
leave much room for in
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:27:11 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Invalid (to me) implies a judgement of the work of the submitter,
> while NOTABUG (to me) implies more a simple variance of opinion,
> recognizing the other viewpoint as possibly valid (not invalid), but
> simply choosing
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:40:28 -0600:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>> "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Arguably no bug is invalid in the normal sense - if someone raises an
>>> issue, they have an issue, regardless
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Hmmm, I'm not sure how much of an regression this is. AFAICT bugzilla
> always required to prefix the search with ALL if you want to search for
> resolved bugs as well. There's even a note about this directly on the
> homepage, below the search box. :)
y
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> On Saturday 24 March 2007, Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> could bugzilla be changed so that the default search includes bugs in all
>> status. instead of just open bugs. I know sometimes I'll miss closed bugs
>> because I'll forget to do an advanced search.
>
> there is an ope
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> could bugzilla be changed so that the default search includes bugs in all
> status. instead of just open bugs. I know sometimes I'll miss closed bugs
> because I'll forget to do an advanced search.
there is an open regression bug about this
-mike
a semi on topic thought.
could bugzilla be changed so that the default search includes bugs in all
status. instead of just open bugs. I know sometimes I'll miss closed bugs
because I'll forget to do an advanced search.
--
Caleb Cushing
"Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Closing INVALID is like saying they never had an issue - when clearly
> they did have an issue, even if it was just an issue of understanding.
If bugs.gentoo.org users think that it's like saying there's no issue,
ISTM the problem is with their unders
Marius Mauch wrote:
> "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Arguably no bug is invalid in the normal sense - if someone raises an
>> issue, they have an issue, regardless what we think of it. To that
>> end I'd like to propose bugzilla be reconfigured to use the phrase
>> "NOCHANGE" in
11 matches
Mail list logo
