060404 Caleb Tennis wrote:
> historically we were much more bleeding edge with our stable KDE versions,
> but if you've spent any significant time playing with 3.5.0 or 3.5.1,
> you would agree that they are terribly less stable than 3.4.3.
Not here ! I've used both (successively) every day
& can
>> I think at this point it does more harm than good to be lagging behind
>> the
>> current upstream kde - last time I checked the kde bugzilla wouldn't
>> even
>> accept bug reports for the kde currently marked stable as it was too
>> old,
>> and if bugs can't be filed then it's clearly "unsuppor
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:42:56 +0200:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 08:09, Philip Webb wrote:
>> KDE is now modular: is it possible to upgrade some modules, but not
>> others ? Kdelibs would need to be stable, but must everything w
Chris Bainbridge posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:12:21 +0100:
> I think at this point it does more harm than good to be lagging behind the
> current upstream kde - last time I checked the kde bugzilla wouldn't even
> accept bug reports for the kde currently mar
Duncan wrote:
> The Gentoo-desktop list is lower volume and generally where I ask
> (developer level) questions about anything so related, KDE, GNOME, burning
> CD/DVDs, sometimes sound issues, etc. Again, that's a developer list not
> a general user list, but it's low enough volume and generally
m h posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:25:56 -0800:
> Diego -
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> Steve-
>
> Sorry to abuse the list. Feel free to point me to the correct place to
> post this. I noticed it in the forums a few times without any answer.
Diego got