[gentoo-dev] Re: user/group manipultaion feedback request.

2005-10-03 Thread Duncan
Tres Melton posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:49:29 -0600: However, this is going to take a couple of weeks to write entirely in bash so that it is both portable and can be used on the most minimal of systems. Imagine seeing /you/ here! =8^) Portability is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: user/group manipultaion feedback request.

2005-10-03 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 03 October 2005 11:14, Duncan wrote: Portability is good, but as I've been reading Diego Flameeyes various posts as he struggles to get Gentoo/FBSD up and running, and with Gentoo/Darwin and etc. in mind, I'm sure one of the requests is going to be making it full borne shell standard

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: user/group manipultaion feedback request.

2005-10-03 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:04 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Monday 03 October 2005 11:14, Duncan wrote: Hello Duncan. Actually, bash is fine, as long as you declare #!/bin/bash the script. Every Gentoo/ALT system should have bash installed as part of base system, as bash is what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: user/group manipultaion feedback request.

2005-10-03 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 03 October 2005 13:39, Tres Melton wrote: I've coded the parts that extract and parse the information from the /etc/{passwd,group} files I think with this you're already out of portability. /etc/passwd structure in Linux and FreeBSD is different, and on Darwin the users part is