Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:19 +0200, Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote: > > Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we > > had in 2006.1, as there comes a time when we simply can't wait for bugs > > to get fixed anymore if we ever plan on releasing, and we're already > > *way*

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-26 Thread Warwick Bruce Chapman
Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we had in 2006.1, as there comes a time when we simply can't wait for bugs to get fixed anymore if we ever plan on releasing, and we're already *way* behind the schedule that we wanted to release under. Ok, what needs done

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 21:57 +0200, Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote: > Will you be marking linux-headers-2.6.19 stable as well? I really think > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160381 needs some serious attention. Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we had in

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-25 Thread Warwick Bruce Chapman
linux-headers isnt anything to do with me or the kernel herd. I can't comment on when it will go stable. k, my bad, who should I be speaking to about what I can do to get it sorted? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-25 Thread Daniel Drake
Petteri Räty wrote: Is Alsa OK too? I remember Diego talking something about it being broken when he as still around. Might be fixed since with 2.6.20.X though. No known significant problems. I think we may have a single occurance of a hda regression to take care of. Daniel -- gentoo-dev@ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-25 Thread Daniel Drake
Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote: Will you be marking linux-headers-2.6.19 stable as well? I really think http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160381 needs some serious attention. linux-headers isnt anything to do with me or the kernel herd. I can't comment on when it will go stable. Daniel -

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-25 Thread Warwick Bruce Chapman
Daniel Drake wrote: I'm planning to request the latest revision of gentoo-sources-2.6.20 go stable on x86 and amd64 in 1-2 weeks from now. Other arches will probably follow soon after. There are still a few new bugs with external modules: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163825 I've c

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-25 Thread Petteri Räty
Daniel Drake kirjoitti: > I'm planning to request the latest revision of gentoo-sources-2.6.20 go > stable on x86 and amd64 in 1-2 weeks from now. Other arches will > probably follow soon after. > > There are still a few new bugs with external modules: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163

[gentoo-dev] 2.6.20 to go stable in 1-2 weeks

2007-03-25 Thread Daniel Drake
I'm planning to request the latest revision of gentoo-sources-2.6.20 go stable on x86 and amd64 in 1-2 weeks from now. Other arches will probably follow soon after. There are still a few new bugs with external modules: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163825 I've commented on every one o