Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Jim Ramsay
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 08 February 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > How would you then reconcile the issues raised in this bug[1] > > regarding /usr/lib and multilib support? > > /usr/lib/misc most likely, or /usr/libexec as you prefer, considering that > the > policy about th

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Jim Ramsay
Ed Catmur wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 11:05 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > I am planning on moving the install locations of all the rox-base/* and > > rox-extra/* applications from their current location (/usr/lib/rox) to > > something a little more FHS-correct[1] and tolerant of multilib support.

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: > How would you then reconcile the issues raised in this bug[1] > regarding /usr/lib and multilib support? /usr/lib/misc most likely, or /usr/libexec as you prefer, considering that the policy about that is still unwritten and probably will not appe

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Jim Ramsay
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 08 February 2007, Thomas Rösner wrote: > > AFAIR App Dirs provide internal arch distinction, so why not just put it > > in /usr/share/rox? > > /usr/share is not a good place for any kind of executable. Also, after compiling the AppDirs (in the few ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Thomas Rösner wrote: > AFAIR App Dirs provide internal arch distinction, so why not just put it > in /usr/share/rox? /usr/share is not a good place for any kind of executable. /usr/lib is more suitable for the purpose. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Ed Catmur
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 11:05 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > I am planning on moving the install locations of all the rox-base/* and > rox-extra/* applications from their current location (/usr/lib/rox) to > something a little more FHS-correct[1] and tolerant of multilib support. > > The main reason for

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Thomas Rösner
Jim Ramsay schrieb: I am planning on moving the install locations of all the rox-base/* and rox-extra/* applications from their current location (/usr/lib/rox) to something a little more FHS-correct[1] and tolerant of multilib support. The main reason for this change is that I got a bug from amd

[gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Jim Ramsay
I am planning on moving the install locations of all the rox-base/* and rox-extra/* applications from their current location (/usr/lib/rox) to something a little more FHS-correct[1] and tolerant of multilib support. The main reason for this change is that I got a bug from amd64 because the /usr/li