Re: [gentoo-dev] About maintaining sci-physics/abinit

2012-04-03 Thread justin
On 03/04/12 00:11, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:22 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: Hello As talked some time ago with Donnie, sci-physics/abinit is hard to maintain and, then, he would like to lastrite it after moving package to sci overlay because looks like nobody from sci

Re: [gentoo-dev] About maintaining sci-physics/abinit

2012-04-03 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 03-04-2012 a las 08:43 +0200, justin escribió: On 03/04/12 00:11, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:22 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: Hello As talked some time ago with Donnie, sci-physics/abinit is hard to maintain and, then, he would like to lastrite it after moving

Re: [gentoo-dev] About maintaining sci-physics/abinit

2012-04-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:22 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: Hello As talked some time ago with Donnie, sci-physics/abinit is hard to maintain and, then, he would like to lastrite it after moving package to sci overlay because looks like nobody from sci team wants to take it. If anybody is

[gentoo-dev] About maintaining sci-physics/abinit

2012-03-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello As talked some time ago with Donnie, sci-physics/abinit is hard to maintain and, then, he would like to lastrite it after moving package to sci overlay because looks like nobody from sci team wants to take it. If anybody is willing to help with maintaining abinit, could he take it? If not,