If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
the next days.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:05 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
> to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
> the next days.
>
i doubt there will be any objection but with such information there
cant be
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:05 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
>> to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
>> the next days.
>>
>
> i doubt there will be any objection bu
On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake,
> > etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only
> > E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes the "confusion" harder.
> >
>
>
Ben de Groot schrieb:
> On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>>> - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake,
>>> etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only
>>> E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes the
On 15/11/2012 11:45, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> ok, so what about ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES as USE_EXPANDED var?
LGTM
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
