> I would hope to split this arch into the two endianness, but I suspect
> nobody has the energy to do it. Oh well.
[...]
> Dev arch. I don't have much info on it, but I heard some mess with
> riscv32 and riscv64, so maybe time to split it? I leave it to riscv arch
> team, which works quite well,
On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 01:20 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> Arthur Zamarin writes:
>
> > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
> > [...]
> > 32-bit arches
> >
> > This includes stable arches x86,
> 32-bit arches
>
> This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and
> maybe more. Those are in much worse situation, with a mess on various
> fronts, some of them super hard to continue support. For example
> qtwebengine is less and less likely to manage
On 2024-06-26 16:29, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> ia64
>
> Dev 64-bit arch. Kernel dropped support, glibc dropped support, devbox
> died - days are short before full exp status or full removal of arch.
Yeah, no interest in ia64, sorry. I'd like it to just go.
This is probably
> > ia64
> >
> > Dev 64-bit arch. Kernel dropped support, glibc dropped support, devbox
> > died - days are short before full exp status or full removal of arch.
>
> Yeah, no interest in ia64, sorry. I'd like it to just go.
This is probably unavoidable given that our devbox and
> riscv
>
> Dev arch. I don't have much info on it, but I heard some mess with
> riscv32 and riscv64, so maybe time to split it? I leave it to riscv arch
> team, which works quite well, but I'll be happy to open discussion for it.
riscv is something new and growing, but for now
> alpha
>
> Exp arch, with nearly (or maybe already) full correct dep-tree. matoro
> did a lot of great work here, so I think we should promote it to dev
> arch, so dep-tree remains unbroken. We dekeyworded a lot of stuff,
> cleaned it up, so a nice "completion bonus".
>
>
> As you all know, Gentoo supports many various arches, in various degrees
> (stable, dev, exp). Let me explain those 3 statuses fast:
>
> * stable arch - meaning we have stable profile for this arch, and stable
> keywords across base-system + varying degree of seriousness. We stable
> stuff
Arthur Zamarin writes:
> Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
> [...]
> 32-bit arches
>
> This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and
> maybe more. Those are in
Arthur Zamarin writes:
> Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
>
> 32-bit arches
>
> This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and
> maybe more. Those are in much
Arthur Zamarin writes:
> Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
>
> [...]
> 32-bit arches
>
> This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and
> maybe more. Those are in
Arthur Zamarin writes:
> Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
>
> [...]
>
> 32-bit arches
>
> This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and
> maybe more. Those are in
Arthur Zamarin writes:
> Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
Absolutely - thanks for doing this. I'm going to split my replies with
alt subject to help keep it organised.
>
> As you all know, Gentoo supports
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 20:33 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> x86
>
> Stable 32-bit arch. I'll be honest, I don't believe at all this should
> be stable arch anymore. I propose making it dev arch, and mass-dekeyword
> stuff we got because of inertia. This arch is close to HW die.
On 2024-06-25 13:33, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
So, are you ready for seeing the mess? Here we go.
Thanks Arthur, I can add some input as another AT.
32-bit arches
This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and
maybe more. Those are in much worse
Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
As you all know, Gentoo supports many various arches, in various degrees
(stable, dev, exp). Let me explain those 3 statuses fast:
* stable arch - meaning we have stable
16 matches
Mail list logo
