Mark Loeser skrev:
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if
you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
necessary.
Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does this mean that gcc-3.4 will no longer have libstdc++ as a
dependency? :-D
That is what I hope to accomplish, yes.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if
you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
necessary.
Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too
Currently we are forcing people to either have gcc-3.3 installed, or
libstdc++-v3 so that old packages that weren't recompiled yet don't break,
and binary packages that need libstdc++.so.5 don't break horribly as well.
I'd like to see this dependency in the gcc ebuilds go away and all of the
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if
you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
necessary.
Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand,
since its been brought to my
Mark Loeser wrote:
Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand,
since its been brought to my attention a virtual would probably be best for
this, so we would handle the || ( gcc-3.3.* libstdc++ ) inside of the
virtual. I'll make one later unless anyone has strong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
| Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|
|So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate
it if
|you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
|necessary.
|
|
| Well, you can tell I
