On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:08:27 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1/20/13 1:46 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 19/01/13 20:10, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
have a way to more simply exclude code that requires CODEC_ID_OPUS.
Exclude in chrome or in libavcodec?
The latter
On 19/01/13 20:10, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
have a way to more simply exclude code that requires CODEC_ID_OPUS.
Exclude in chrome or in libavcodec?
The latter is a matter of adding --disable-decoder=opus and/or not
--enable-libopus in the configure.
lu
On 1/20/13 1:46 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 19/01/13 20:10, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
have a way to more simply exclude code that requires CODEC_ID_OPUS.
Exclude in chrome or in libavcodec?
The latter is a matter of adding --disable-decoder=opus and/or not
--enable-libopus in the configure.
On 1/15/13 4:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of
ffmpeg:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1/15/13 4:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions
of ffmpeg:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
What when chromium upstream uses code more recent than latest ffmpeg
release and it doesn't compile against latest release?
Blame
On 15/01/13 05:34, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of
ffmpeg:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion
(although not stated there, that includes libav).
Now the initial response there is
On 16/01/13 12:54, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1/15/13 4:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to make Chromium be more
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:12 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
What when chromium upstream uses code more recent than latest
On 1/16/13 8:40 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
Google generally prefers agility. Particularly when machines have gobs
of memory (so bundling is not as big of a deal as it was previously)
and they can staff security fixes for all their bundled libs. This is
quite a pervasive attitude there. Coming from
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of
ffmpeg:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion
(although not stated there, that includes
On 1/15/13 4:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:34:42 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of
ffmpeg:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of
ffmpeg:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion
(although not stated there, that includes libav).
Now the initial response there is not enthusiastic (which doesn't
surprise me), but
13 matches
Mail list logo
