Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1

2005-09-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 14:51 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: According to the release announcement the package cd's don't seem to have an athlon version any more. http://www.gentoo.org/news/20050808-annoncement-release-2005.1.xml (the choices seem to be alpha amd64 ppc (32 bit) ppc (64 bit) sparc64

Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1

2005-09-16 Thread Nick Rout
Thanks for the clarification Chris. On a semi-related matter I was looking for the catalyst .spec files, and see a thread pointing at cvs, however I believe that as a non-dev mortal I can't get access to gentoo cvs. Is that so? If it is then how does one get the spec files? The old catalyst howto

Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1

2005-09-16 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 08:23:47AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote: Thanks for the clarification Chris. On a semi-related matter I was looking for the catalyst .spec files, and see a thread pointing at cvs, however I believe that as a non-dev mortal I can't get access to gentoo cvs. Is that so? If it

[gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1

2005-09-15 Thread Nick Rout
I am looking at building a box this weekend. I want to use 2005.1 and if possible the packages cd (for a quick result) . I have an athlon 1133. I am re-building it after a root account compromise (don't ask or I'll cry). According to the release announcement the package cd's don't seem to have