On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:53:51 +0300
Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May be a little OT, but just two of four ancient-sayings:
> 1.Never accept things personaly (everyone is acting on his own
> motives); 2.Try not to make assumptions (just ask questions, till you
> get it). Clearly (from ab
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:37:04 +0200
"Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I'm a native speaker [...]
>
> Yeah, right. May I remind you that you're a USian ?
>
> :o)
>
> Denis.
Hi,
May be a little OT, but just two of four ancie
On 3/25/07, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well I'm a native speaker [...]
Yeah, right. May I remind you that you're a USian ?
:o)
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> Sadly, this just goes to show how people need to be more careful in
> their wording in a community like ours with people coming from so many
> different cultures. Or maybe people need to lighten up a bit more, I
> don't really know which.
>
> Anyone have any further suggestions how we as a comm
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Mike Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:21:46 +0200
>
> Alin NÄstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > > In which case it must be a feature, so why not use the keyword
> > > FEATURE?
> >
> > Why would we need a keyword for that? We already have "e
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Mike Kelly wrote:
> Or maybe people need to lighten up a bit more
there it is
-mike
pgpfSL9nLJFvd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:21:46 +0200
Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > In which case it must be a feature, so why not use the keyword
> > FEATURE?
>
> Why would we need a keyword for that? We already have "enhancement"
> as a possible value of the severity field
