Robert Buchholz schrieb:
> On Sunday, 5. October 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> It's not. If you want to have default DOCS then you should loop
> through the items and check with [[ -e ]] before trying to
> install them.
So, maybe j
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote:
>> So if the ebuild includes non-existing files in DOCS, then why would
>> you want to suppress the warnings?
> I don't. My point was that the default action on an empty DOCS
> variable is to "dodoc AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README", and this
> should
On Sunday, 5. October 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> >> >
> >> > It's not. If you want to have default DOCS then you should loop
> >> > through the items and check with [[ -e ]] before trying to
> >> > install them.
> >>
> >> So, maybe just do a 'do
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote:
>> > It's not. If you want to have default DOCS then you should loop
>> > through the items and check with [[ -e ]] before trying to
>> > install them.
>> So, maybe just do a 'dodoc "${DOCS}"' and omit the die? Then it won't
>> fail but the warning
On Sunday, 5. October 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >>>
> >>> dodoc ${DOCS} || die "dodoc failed"
> >>
> >> This seems alright fine to me
> >
> > It's not. If you want to have default DOCS then you should loop
> > through the items and check with [[
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> dodoc ${DOCS} || die "dodoc failed"
>> This seems alright fine to me
> It's not. If you want to have default DOCS then you should loop
> through the items and check with [[ -e ]] before trying to install
> them.
I'm not convinced that this is a
On 21-09-2008 02:47:41 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> updated version:
> if [ -f Makefile -o -f GNUmakefile -o -f makefile ]; then
> emake DESTDIR="${D}" install || einstall
> if [[ $?>0 ]]; then
Please either use POSIX or bash, mixing them looks so ugly and point
Petteri Räty schrieb:
> Thomas Sachau kirjoitti:
>> I see, we have a default src_unpack and a default src_compile but a
>> default src_install is still
>> missing. Here is my suggestion (taken and modified from bug 33544):
>>
>> src_install() {
>> if [ -f Makefile -o -f GNUmakefile -o -f makefi
Thomas Sachau kirjoitti:
I see, we have a default src_unpack and a default src_compile but a default
src_install is still
missing. Here is my suggestion (taken and modified from bug 33544):
src_install() {
if [ -f Makefile -o -f GNUmakefile -o -f makefile ]; then
emake D
I see, we have a default src_unpack and a default src_compile but a default
src_install is still
missing. Here is my suggestion (taken and modified from bug 33544):
src_install() {
if [ -f Makefile -o -f GNUmakefile -o -f makefile ]; then
emake DESTDIR=${D} install || die
10 matches
Mail list logo
