Le mardi 02 avril 2013 à 09:43 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:31 +0200
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn:
> > > > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf"
> > > > anywh
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 21:46:08 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> El mar, 02-04-2013 a las 00:42 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
> [...]
>
> I will try to remember the issue, but not sure if probably a bug or a
> tracker bug would be better to prevent this from being forgotten
> again :/
Ah don't
El mar, 02-04-2013 a las 00:42 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
[...]
I will try to remember the issue, but not sure if probably a bug or a
tracker bug would be better to prevent this from being forgotten
again :/
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:31 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn:
> > > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf"
> > > anywhere.
> >
> > Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to non-mDNS
On 2 April 2013 08:17, Alex Xu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kill zeroconf and use "dnssd", "upnp", "ssdp". Problem solved?
I'm not too enthusiastic about that.
USE=zeroconf on pulseaudio is a bit easier to understand than
USE=ssdp, for example.
--
Arun Raghavan
h
On 04/01/2013 10:47 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> Kill zeroconf and use "dnssd", "upnp", "ssdp". Problem solved?
I very much like the approach in principle, though. Digging briefly into
Wikipedia[1], UPnP has several components:
* AutoIP (IPv4LL)
* SSDP (So, a separate "ssdp" USE flag may not be necessary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kill zeroconf and use "dnssd", "upnp", "ssdp". Problem solved?
On 01/04/13 06:43 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher
> Nguyễn:
>>> I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn:
> > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf"
> > anywhere.
>
> Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to non-mDNS/DNS-SD based
> zeroconf like UPnP/SSDP?
No idea to be honest... :| opini
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:16:03 schrieb Gilles Dartiguelongue:
> Le lundi 01 avril 2013 à 23:58 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel a écrit :
> > "Zeroconf" describes a service autodiscovery and autoconfiguration
> > standard, see [1]. Avahi is the implementation of that standard which we
> > have in th
Andreas K. Huettel schrieb:
> Avahi is the implementation of that standard which we have in the
> portage tree [2]. Other implementations are mDNSResponder (which was in
> the tree some time ago but got kicked out) and Apple's Bonjour (which
> never was in the tree and probably never will be).
P
Le lundi 01 avril 2013 à 23:58 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> first of all, I'm not really an expert in this stuff, so feel free to tell me
> about any mis-assumptions...
>
> As far as I can see, we have two global useflags:
> avahi - Add avahi/Zeroconf support
> zero
Hi everyone,
first of all, I'm not really an expert in this stuff, so feel free to tell me
about any mis-assumptions...
As far as I can see, we have two global useflags:
avahi - Add avahi/Zeroconf support
zeroconf - Support for DNS Service Discovery (DNS-SD)
"Zeroconf" describes a service aut
12 matches
Mail list logo
