Re: [gentoo-dev] Its time to mask sys-libs/uclibc

2018-02-23 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 2/23/18 11:22 AM, Matthias Maier wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 10:01 CST, "Anthony G. Basile" > wrote: > >> [...] > >> I'm not even sure a news item is needed here. What do people think? If >> you think so, who do I even direct it at? > > If there is no action needed on user side a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Its time to mask sys-libs/uclibc

2018-02-23 Thread Matthias Maier
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 10:01 CST, "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > [...] > I'm not even sure a news item is needed here. What do people think? If > you think so, who do I even direct it at? If there is no action needed on user side and an upgrade and migration from uclibc to uclibc-ng happens

[gentoo-dev] Its time to mask sys-libs/uclibc

2018-02-23 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, So if anyone has been following uclibc, you know that its development stalled with its last official release in 2012 (https://uclibc.org/). It was forked into uclibc-ng (https://uclibc-ng.org/) which has been actively maintained since. All my uclibc work has been done using sys-libs/