On Wed, 2024-06-12 at 08:57 +0300, Viorel Munteanu wrote:
>
> I had to bump to EAPI 8 and unmask dev-php/pear, because it's used by
> the eclass. This makes the thread subject a bit wrong, but I won't
> change it.
Thanks, I think once most of the PEAR packages are removed, we'll be
very close
La 11.06.2024 22:48, Michael Orlitzky a scris:
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 14:56 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
Sounds good to me, then please make sure all that dependency tree needed
for those targets are EAPI bumped, and most QA warnings from pkgcheck
are handled. Currently those packages look unmain
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 14:56 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me, then please make sure all that dependency tree needed
> for those targets are EAPI bumped, and most QA warnings from pkgcheck
> are handled. Currently those packages look unmaintained.
>
> When you (or anyone else) ha
On 11/06/2024 14.54, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 2024-06-11 07:11:06, Viorel Munteanu wrote:
>>
>> # Viorel Munteanu (2024-06-11)
>> # dev-php/pear, dev-php/PEAR-* and their reverse dependencies: mask for
>> removal
>> # in 30 days.
>> # They are all unmaintained, most of the ebuilds are still E
On 2024-06-11 07:11:06, Viorel Munteanu wrote:
>
> # Viorel Munteanu (2024-06-11)
> # dev-php/pear, dev-php/PEAR-* and their reverse dependencies: mask for
> removal
> # in 30 days.
> # They are all unmaintained, most of the ebuilds are still EAPI 6, and
> together
> # they have around 40 bugs.
# Viorel Munteanu (2024-06-11)
# dev-php/pear, dev-php/PEAR-* and their reverse dependencies: mask for
removal
# in 30 days.
# They are all unmaintained, most of the ebuilds are still EAPI 6, and
together
# they have around 40 bugs.
# Removal: 2024-07-11. Bug #933998.
app-admin/drush
dev-p
