[gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of the stand-alone module since March 2005. Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the external module in portage I will package.mas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in > the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of > the stand-alone module since March 2005. Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Tim Yamin
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in > > the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of > > the stand-alone module since March 2005.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 22 April 2006 15:46, Tim Yamin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > > Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in > > > the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the > next few weeks? What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile against linux-2.4.x anyways. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > > Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the > > next few weeks? > > What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile > against linux-2.4.x

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-24 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 07:03:02PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > That's a different matter. I didn't realize that it was 2.6 _only_. My > apologies. I should have looked for that before responding. > > Also: while there are still a couple of 2.6 kernels in the tree prior to > 2.6.10, I'm going to spe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-30 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:52:20PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the > external module in portage I will package.mask it in a week from now > and remove it from portage 30 days later. I have now package.masked app-laptop/ibm-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-05-01 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:52:20PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the > external module in portage I will package.mask it in a week from now > and remove it from portage 30 days later. I have now p.masked app-laptop/ibm-acpi.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-05-29 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > I have now p.masked app-laptop/ibm-acpi. It will be removed from the > tree in 30 days. Gone. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd pgpgwdui5RTi6.pgp Description