On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Caleb Tennis wrote:
It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in
dev-util, but they might be better served in something like dev-scm
or something like that. [...]
Any objections to this potential move, or comments on a better
category name?
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:16 -0500 (EST)
Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in
dev-util, but they might be better served in something like dev-scm
or something like that. I'm thinking things like darcs, git, cvs,
svn,
Hi,
It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in dev-util, but
they might be better served in something like dev-scm or something like that.
I'm
thinking things like darcs, git, cvs, svn, mercurial, bzr. Then the slew of
packages that depend on them: gitosis, bzrtools.
Caleb Tennis a écrit :
Any objections to this potential move, or comments on a better category name?
No objections. Just wondering about tools like gitweb, will they stay in
web-apps?
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:57:39 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:16 -0500 (EST)
Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in
dev-util, but they might be better served in something like dev-scm
On Feb 1, 2008 11:34 PM, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC it was because you argued that cvs didn't qualify
as a VCS (as the proposed category name back then was app-vcs)
I dont see why cvs is not a vcs like the others but ok.
But I'm all in for a dev-scm (or similar) category.
