Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
On 3/28/07, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jakub Moc wrote: > Bryan Østergaard napsal(a): >> Nobody is forcing anybody to use in-kernel drivers. > > Uhm... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172490 Sorry, my comments on that bug are a little unclear. I am not suggesting removal of

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Joseph Jezak
> I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side > (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced, by redirecting users who file bugs > against it to reproduce with the in-kernel drivers, and then let kernel For what it's worth, the PPC team has been suggesting the use of the in-kernel drivers for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:54:04 -0400 Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm fully 100% serious on the above. I challenge you to PROVE ME > WRONG. I secretly hope you do, since that means I'll get a couple of > interesting bugs to handle and I may even be able to solve them > myself. There wa

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 13:54 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > > Even though I'm sure my personal opinion is clear, I don't have a strong > stake in the ALSA herd. The real reason why alsa-driver is not getting > any support behind it right now is that nobody is standing behind it. > > If someone want

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:05 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > Anyhow, I would like to see alsa-drivers removed, but only with the > condition that the in-kernel ALSA drivers work as expected. The bug I > mentioned, if you reread it, you will notice that if there was no > external alsa-driver, hda-i

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Jakub Moc wrote: Bryan Østergaard napsal(a): Nobody is forcing anybody to use in-kernel drivers. Uhm... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172490 Sorry, my comments on that bug are a little unclear. I am not suggesting removal of alsa-driver from Portage, neither I am suggesting that t

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Jakub Moc wrote: It not only doesn't work for me, Bug please! :) it doesn't work for majority of people that have responded on this thread. So, something's wrong there I guess? :) I don't regard this thread as quantifiable measure. Nevertheless, lets count the number of successes and failu

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:36:57PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Bryan Østergaard napsal(a): > > Nobody is forcing anybody to use in-kernel drivers. > > Uhm... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172490 > Which isn't exactly the same as removing alsa-driver and forcing people to use in-kernel driv

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
Anyhow, I would like to see alsa-drivers removed, but only with the condition that the in-kernel ALSA drivers work as expected. The bug I mentioned, if you reread it, you will notice that if there was no external alsa-driver, hda-intel would be marked broken as well, for some users. Just to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: Well, to be honest, I am neither supporter nor detractor. I think that it's upstream that should go and fix themselves. It's them who have caused all this. The bug you linked to is a natural effect of maintaining kernel drivers outside of the kernel source tree. It i

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Jakub Moc
Bryan Østergaard napsal(a): > Nobody is forcing anybody to use in-kernel drivers. Uhm... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172490 -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
Well, to be honest, I am neither supporter nor detractor. I think that it's upstream that should go and fix themselves. It's them who have caused all this. ALSA guys do not support in-kernel stuff. Kernel guys do not support alsa stuff. Great, isn't it? On 3/28/07, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: The fact is that the bug has been around for quite a long time now: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165679 This bug is exactly the kind that makes maintaining alsa-driver (and any other out-of-kernel module) a small nightmare. It's exactly the kind of bug that

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Seemant Kulleen
So, maybe this is a boneheadedly obvious thing, but having just spoken with Daniel about this, I'll just summarise my findings. I, for one, was always using alsa-driver for my new Dell laptop. As it turns out, Dan has the identical laptop, but he's always been using the in-kernel driver. I alway

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:49:25PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Daniel Drake napsal(a): > > Jakub Moc wrote: > >> - The in-kernel drivers seriously are not an equivalent alternative, let > >> alone the preferred one, for stuff like hda-intel or any similar drivers > >> that are under permanent heavy d

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Jakub Moc
Daniel Drake napsal(a): > Jakub Moc wrote: >> - The in-kernel drivers seriously are not an equivalent alternative, let >> alone the preferred one, for stuff like hda-intel or any similar drivers >> that are under permanent heavy development, at least for now. > > If hda-intel (or any other driver)

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
The fact is that the bug has been around for quite a long time now: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165679 Anyway, see Flameeyes's comments for details (in the ChangeLog) On 3/28/07, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Doug Goldstein wrote: > The only crummy thing about this is that

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Mike Pagano wrote: Just a user opinion here, but I find the need to use unstable alsa-driver to solve a bug every now and then. This procedure would be more complicated if I had to run a development kernel to solve a sound problem. And you'll still have that option. I hope you file bugs when t

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Mike Pagano
On 3/28/07, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: < snip > ...here are the diffs of the latest alsa development release vs the latest kernel development release: < snip> Just a user opinion here, but I find the need to use unstable alsa-driver to solve a bug every now and then. This proced

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Doug Goldstein wrote: The only crummy thing about this is that the in kernel drivers have NEVER supported my sound card. Not even on 2.6.20. I'm using hda-intel and it just never works. I end up always returning back to alsa-driver. So I don't think that the code bases are the same. Please file

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Jakub, Thanks for your input. Please remember that alsa-driver isn't going away any time soon. Jakub Moc wrote: - The in-kernel drivers seriously are not an equivalent alternative, let alone the preferred one, for stuff like hda-intel or any similar drivers that are under permanent heavy d

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Dominique Michel
Le Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:22:22 +0200, "Ioannis Aslanidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On 3/28/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Josh Saddler napsal(a): > > > I completely disagree with your assessment of the in-kernel hda-intel > > > state. My workstation uses one of those (labelled n

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:54:21 -0400 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Drake wrote: > > > > I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side > > (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced, by redirecting users who file bugs > > against it to reproduce with the in-kernel drivers, an

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Doug Goldstein
Daniel Drake wrote: > > I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side > (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced, by redirecting users who file bugs > against it to reproduce with the in-kernel drivers, and then let kernel > handle the bug resolution. This will remove duplicated maintenance e

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 01:46 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote: > At the very least, this should cut down on spurious bug reports on our > own bugzilla. However, it'd be nice from the point of view of the GDP if > the kernel and ALSA maintainers would decide, once and for all, what > should be supported and

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Michael Krelin
> > I completely disagree with your assessment of the in-kernel hda-intel > state. My workstation uses one of those (labelled nVidia MCP 55, for the > curious), and my experiences with in-kernel ALSA have been nothing but > positive with the intel audio, whether compiled or as modules. I have two

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
On 3/28/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Josh Saddler napsal(a): > I completely disagree with your assessment of the in-kernel hda-intel > state. My workstation uses one of those (labelled nVidia MCP 55, for the > curious), and my experiences with in-kernel ALSA have been nothing but > po

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Jakub Moc
Josh Saddler napsal(a): > I completely disagree with your assessment of the in-kernel hda-intel > state. My workstation uses one of those (labelled nVidia MCP 55, for the > curious), and my experiences with in-kernel ALSA have been nothing but > positive with the intel audio, whether compiled or as

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Josh Saddler
Jakub Moc wrote: > Uhm... Sorry to see this issue brought up yet again. Just a couple of > brief notes: > > - The in-kernel drivers seriously are not an equivalent alternative, let > alone the preferred one, for stuff like hda-intel or any similar drivers > that are under permanent heavy developme

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-27 Thread Jakub Moc
Daniel Drake napsal(a): > I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side > (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced, by redirecting users who file bugs > against it to reproduce with the in-kernel drivers, and then let kernel > handle the bug resolution. This will remove duplicated maintenance

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-27 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:13 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > > I have suggested that herd support for the kernelspace side > (alsa-driver) be slowly reduced No complaints here, FYI never used alsa-driver. I have always compiled it in, because rarely do I change sound cards in a machine. Or have the ne

[gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-27 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, We have some new ALSA maintainers: beandog, chainsaw, phreak (and me helping out to start with) It's of course up to the maintainers to choose how they work, but the recommendations I have laid down have been that they focus on the userspace side: utils, tools, firmware, lib. I have suggest