On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:52 -0400, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Supposedly 2.0.2 was going to be 64-bit clean, but I'm pretty sure that
didn't happen. However, there have been reports that oo-build works
under a very strict set of conditions.
This was the original plan once, but the work didn't get
Open office appears to be masked (amd64). Who would I ask to find out the
current status?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Dennis Allison wrote:
Open office appears to be masked (amd64). Who would I ask to find out the
current status?
It is masked because the current version does not compile on amd64. You can use
openoffice-bin for now.
--
Andrew Gaffney
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 01:13 pm, Dennis Allison wrote:
Open office appears to be masked (amd64). Who would I ask to find out the
current status?
That would be suka, but just to somewhat summarize, there are a lot of issues
in getting it ported to amd64, and upstream itself is using lots
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Allison wrote:
Open office appears to be masked (amd64). Who would I ask to find out the
current status?
OpenOffice doesn't currently compile on 64-bit architectures, you can
use openoffice-bin, which is a 32-bit binary, on amd64 for now.
Chris White wrote:
That would be suka, but just to somewhat summarize, there are a lot of issues
in getting it ported to amd64, and upstream itself is using lots of manpower
to try and resolve this issue. At this point it's pretty much going with what
upstream is doing. I tried it personally
