On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 13:52 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Thomas Rösner wrote:
> > Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > Have netscape-flash with IUSE="vanilla" (by default it is off),
> > > which when enabled will not pull in libflashsupport.
> > >
> >
> > I don't quite see why this is necessary?
Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 13:19 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > Olivier Crête wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 12:12 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > > Josh Saddler wrote:
> > > > > Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > > > > I suppose I could also propose:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4) netscape-fl
Thomas Rösner wrote:
> Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Have netscape-flash with IUSE="vanilla" (by default it is off),
> > which when enabled will not pull in libflashsupport.
> >
>
> I don't quite see why this is necessary? Or why you do have this
> discussion?
I started this discussion to f
Hi,
Jim Ramsay wrote:
> [snip]
> Have netscape-flash with IUSE="vanilla" (by default it is off), which
> when enabled will not pull in libflashsupport.
>
I don't quite see why this is necessary? Or why you do have this discussion?
> This meets the following goals:
>
> 1) It makes it easy for
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 13:19 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Olivier Crête wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 12:12 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > Josh Saddler wrote:
> > > > Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > > > I suppose I could also propose:
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport
Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 12:12 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > Josh Saddler wrote:
> > > Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > > I suppose I could also propose:
> > > >
> > > > 4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time.
> > > > It's certainly not a large library to be adde
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 12:12 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
> > Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > I suppose I could also propose:
> > >
> > > 4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time.
> > > It's certainly not a large library to be added on.
> > >
> >
> > That is a ter
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > I suppose I could also propose:
> >
> > 4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time.
> > It's certainly not a large library to be added on.
> >
>
> That is a terrible idea. Don't make it "depend" on something that it
> clearly does
Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Olivier Crête wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 14:20 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
>>> Jim Ramsay wrote:
1) Create a single local USE flag (flashsupport or something)
that will just pull in this dependency.
2) Use the same set of USE flags as libflashsupport ha
Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 14:20 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) Create a single local USE flag (flashsupport or something)
> > > that will just pull in this dependency.
> > >
> > > 2) Use the same set of USE flags as libflashsupport has, with a
On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 14:20 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
> Jim Ramsay wrote:
> >
> > 1) Create a single local USE flag (flashsupport or something) that will
> > just pull in this dependency.
> >
> > 2) Use the same set of USE flags as libflashsupport has, with any of
> > them adding libflashsuppo
Jim Ramsay wrote:
>
> 1) Create a single local USE flag (flashsupport or something) that will
> just pull in this dependency.
>
> 2) Use the same set of USE flags as libflashsupport has, with any of
> them adding libflashsupport to the dep list, since these are all global
> flags and will most li
I am about to add libflashsupport[1] to the tree, which optionally adds
pulseaudio, oss, esd, and ssl (via openssl or gnutls) support to
netscape-flash-9.0.31.0
This libflashsupport-1.2 will have the following use flags:
pulseaudio oss esd ssl gnutls
Now, I was thinking that it would be much e
13 matches
Mail list logo
