On 11/24/2011 07:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
>> Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
>> right?
>
> Not until it is stabilized and made the default. I'm not sure what
> the plans are for that.
It's
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Paludis doesn't want you to run lafilefixer since it breaks VDB, and
> won't integrate any functionality along these lines unless it's EAPI
> controlled and well specified.
IIUC, Portage fixes libtool archives after the src_install phase but
bef
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:14:01 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Also maybe it could still be needed by people using other package
> manager (but I am a portage user and don't know how these problems are
> solved in pkgcore/paludis :-/)
Paludis doesn't want you to run lafilefixer since it breaks VDB, and
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:14 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 07:37 -0800, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > > On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new main
El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 07:37 -0800, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> > >
> > > dev-util/lafilefixer
> >
> > Do we still
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
app-text/pdfshuffler
I'll take this one
Andrey
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> >
> > dev-util/lafilefixer
>
> Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
> right?
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
> right?
Not until it is stabilized and made the default. I'm not sure what
the plans are for that.
Rich
On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
>
> dev-util/lafilefixer
Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
right?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
app-text/pdfshuffler
dev-util/lafilefixer
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
10 matches
Mail list logo