Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of 2011-09-19 18:05:39 +0200:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 11:35:09 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:11:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > by that token, i'll go ahead and remove glibc's static
> > > > > libraries since upstream doesn't
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:36:57 Thomas Kahle wrote:
> On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote
On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves. While a
On Monday, September 19, 2011 11:35:09 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:11:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > by that token, i'll go ahead and remove glibc's static libraries
> > > > since upstream doesn't even support static linking
> > >
> > > I'm probably ignorant so you'd have
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:11:31 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > by that token, i'll go ahead and remove glibc's static libraries
> > > since upstream doesn't even support static linking
> >
> > I'm probably ignorant so you'd have to elaborate more on that to
> > make me see a problem there.
>
>
On Monday, September 19, 2011 10:57:30 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:43:04 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday, September 19, 2011 03:10:45 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:43:04 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 03:10:45 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał G
On Monday, September 19, 2011 03:10:45 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves. While at it, it
> > > may be better to just drop the flag if no o
On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves. While at it, it may be
> > better to just drop the flag if no other package relies on it and no
> > user has ever requested the st
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
[snip]
> '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves. While at it, it may be
> better to just drop the flag if no other package relies on it and no
> user has ever requested the static build of that package.
>
I don't see any harm with includ
Hello all,
Considering that the 'magical IUSE check' in autotools-utils (and a few
other eclasses) is considered broken, and taking Diego's word [1],
I'd like to ask you to reconsider your uses of IUSE=static-libs.
To be honest, I'd like to remove that magic soon which means that all
ebuilds need
12 matches
Mail list logo