On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 17:08 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:30 -0700, Corey Shields wrote:
> > I think that nomirror should be used as seldom as possible. Licensing
> > issues
> > are legit. We've had one case where mirror admins complained about a file
> > that was t
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:30 -0700, Corey Shields wrote:
> I think that nomirror should be used as seldom as possible. Licensing issues
> are legit. We've had one case where mirror admins complained about a file
> that was too big (a 2 gig neverwinter nights file), but otherwise I have
> talked
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:53:03PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:37:07AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> > I know only one mirror network who could worth the hassle: cpan.
> > Perl has a nice geographically distributed network of mirrors. Too bad
> > portage can't automati
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:37:07AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> I know only one mirror network who could worth the hassle: cpan.
> Perl has a nice geographically distributed network of mirrors. Too bad
> portage can't automatically select the closest cpan mirror. :(
You can already put in specific m
Corey Shields wrote:
>At one point in time someone suggested that we may as well utilize other
>people's mirror networks that are already out there, rather than our own.
>This then got implemented for stuff like sourceforge packages.
>
>Unfortunately this plays hell for lots of people. If you
Corey Shields wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:06 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to
>>fixing them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all
>>just a bunch of lazy bums anyways ;)
>
>
> I smell a new dev
On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:06 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
> We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to
> fixing them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all
> just a bunch of lazy bums anyways ;)
I smell a new dev requirement.. "Fix 10 nomirror
Mike Frysinger wrote:
[snip]
>>RESTRICT=[no]mirror
>>---
>>- Files too large for the mirrors? (What is the size limit?)
>
>
> yes ...
We should probably have a hard definition for this or expectations to the rule
too. Let me look through our current distfiles and see how big we
On Thursday 05 May 2005 05:04 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> RESTRICT=[no]fetch
> --
> Should be used if the license prohibits unattended/automated download
> (eg click-through licenses), or the upstream author wants all downloads
> to be manually done from their site (I know of at l
On Thursday 05 May 2005 02:04 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Unless there is something I've missed, why do we have ebuilds with
> RESTRICT=nomirror, having a GPL-2 license, and distributed via
> sourceforge? Wouldn't RESTRICT=primaryuri be much better? Most fetches
> would go to SF first, and we'd s
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:04:20 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I've tried to dig through our policy documents, to find the policy
| regarding RESTRICT=mirror/fetch. I don't find anything in the htdocs
| tree from CVS, beyond a few brief mentions in the handbook.
Some of it's in
Hi,
I've tried to dig through our policy documents, to find the policy
regarding RESTRICT=mirror/fetch. I don't find anything in the htdocs
tree from CVS, beyond a few brief mentions in the handbook.
RESTRICT=[no]fetch
--
Should be used if the license prohibits unattended/automate
12 matches
Mail list logo
