On Monday 12 June 2006 16:58, Stephen Bennett wrote:
I am also aware that this falls roughly under what the Council was
asked to discuss in its June meeting, but since that seems to have not
happened, I'm bringing it up anyway, since I would like to get
something done here.
we meet Jun 15th
On Monday 12 June 2006 17:15, Brian Harring wrote:
B) council
outcome tomorrow (no point in changing it till they've weighed in on
the whole enchilada).
not really
it makes people dropping in their own stuff easier and doesnt adversely affect
the portage tree in any way
-mike
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 21:58 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
Comments?
Please postpone any such changes, if approved, until at least July, as
we will be doing a snapshot before then, and I would prefer not having
to spend our entire release cycle just fixing possible problems from
these changes.
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 14:15 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
One of these, which seems to
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:42:16 -0400
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please postpone any such changes, if approved, until at least July, as
we will be doing a snapshot before then, and I would prefer not having
to spend our entire release cycle just fixing possible problems from
these
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
One of these, which seems to have been largely missed in amongst the
other noise, forms
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:07:34 +0200 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Monday 12 June 2006 22:58, Stephen Bennett wrote:
| I would like to think that this proposal addresses most of the
| concerns raised in the last thread -- it implies nothing about
| support for any other
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:09:38 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can spot those issues and fix them w/out rush on package
mantainers, no problems at all.
I was assuming that they would be treated more or less as minor QA
issues are currently.
PS: there is a formal spec about
