On Втр, 2006-06-06 at 00:17 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
That's why we use a SCM for managing the ebuilds: the removed ebuilds
are still found via cvs commands and on sources.gentoo.org
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick way
for such things?
Peter.
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick way
for such things?
Use site:sources.gentoo.org package as query, e.g.
http://www.google.ch/search?q=site%3Asources.gentoo.org+sonarbtnG=Suchemeta=
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Втр, 2006-06-06 at 00:17 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
That's why we use a SCM for managing the ebuilds: the removed ebuilds
are still found via cvs commands and on sources.gentoo.org
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
[...]
Gets my vote. Good idea. :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEhFG6rsJQqN81j74RAsO1AKCybk+IHs6Bta0Jj/ZCoo2UP3YqZACeNLms
bJowAD/7a9ukWOzX+qPVcAo=
=a6gy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
On Saturday 03 June 2006 17:43, Alec Warner wrote:
I propose a new QA subproject, the TreeCleaners.
Great initiative! I'm all for it.
For a sidenote, If it is possible, can a unmaintained repo be created for
removed packages? If an interested developer comes along the day some time
later, and
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 00:12, Eldad Zack wrote:
If an interested developer comes along the day some time
later, and the ebuild is untrivial, it can be a time-saver starting from
the last version at some cases - especially if the ebuild was punted
because of security issues.
That's why we use
I propose a new QA subproject, the TreeCleaners.
This is a delicate subject for some developers, other developers don't
care, and yet others want the cruft in the tree removed. The Tree
Cleaning project's main goal is to identify broken and unmaintained
packages in the tree and either get
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:43:39AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Questions and Comments are welcome, as always.
Sounds like it will be a lot of work - but it a job that really needs
to be done on a regular basis, imho. I would be happy to see such a
subproject being launched.
The rules you stated
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I propose a new QA subproject, the TreeCleaners.
Questions and Comments are welcome, as always.
This has my support. Hopefully it will help us get rid of a lot of
cruft that hasn't been touched in ages and doesn't even work.
Thanks,
--
Mark Loeser -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
I propose a new QA subproject, the TreeCleaners.
[snip]
+1 on this idea
- --
===
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
Gentoo
+1 from me, too. I also want to offer my help to this project, so ping
me if needed.
Kind regards,
DerCorny
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Alec Warner wrote:
The maintainer tag must contain an active (non-retired) developer
or team.
Minor wording issue - what about ...developer or a properly functional
team? Just in case all members of the team die...
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
signature.asc
12 matches
Mail list logo
