On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:03:51 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:01:35 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> >
> > >> The same tags shouldn't be used for different things.
> >
> > > Then we might as well extend the DTD to have
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:12:13 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller
> wrote:
> >
> > I had just given some reasons above, in the part that you haven't
> > quoted.
> >
>
> My main issue was with the "burden of proof" bit. This isn't a court
> - we're free to
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:40:50 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:16:32 +0200
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:42:40 +0200
> > Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> >
> > > On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml:
> >
> > IRC is huge; where did you m
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:01:35 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> >> The same tags shouldn't be used for different things.
>
> > Then we might as well extend the DTD to have a required tag
> > nested in each tag.
>
> But IIUC, the DTD must be cha
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> I had just given some reasons above, in the part that you haven't
> quoted.
>
My main issue was with the "burden of proof" bit. This isn't a court
- we're free to do whatever seems to make the most sense, and not
worry about what kind of
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> The same tags shouldn't be used for different things.
> Then we might as well extend the DTD to have a required tag
> nested in each tag.
But IIUC, the DTD must be changed also if the tag is removed?
(Unless we want to leave a dead element i
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:09:30 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> >
> > [address of the herd]
> > [name of the herd]
> >
>
> The same tags shouldn't be used for different things.
Then we might as well extend the DTD to have a required tag
n
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
[Restoring context omitted from quote.]
>> The same tags shouldn't be used for different things. First of all,
>> the tag is optional, so we cannot rely on its being present.
>> Second, for a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
>> Please provide some examples of when and how that piece of
>> information, "herd", is important.
>
> Don't shift the burden of proof, please.
>
Meh, knowing if the status quo is useful is
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> [address of the herd]
> [name of the herd]
>
The same tags shouldn't be used for different things. First of all,
the tag is optional, so we cannot rely on its being present.
Second, for a given e-mail address, some information is needed
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:16:32 +0200
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:42:40 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml:
>
> IRC is huge; where did you manage to find consensus in there with
> whom?
I have no idea how to respond
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:42:40 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml:
IRC is huge; where did you manage to find consensus in there with whom?
> 1 ) We should
> 1a) deprecate the tag in metadata.xml (that's 17,856 files or
> so?) in favou
Dnia 2014-09-29, o godz. 20:13:19
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Dnia 2014-09-29, o godz. 19:20:54
> > Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>
> >> This will lose the information if a maintainer is a project/team or
> >> an individual developer, which I
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-09-29, o godz. 19:20:54
> Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>> This will lose the information if a maintainer is a project/team or
>> an individual developer, which I think is still useful.
>>
>> Could we keep this information somehow? Maybe b
Dnia 2014-09-29, o godz. 19:20:54
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml:
>
> > 1 ) We should
> > 1a) deprecate the tag in metadata.xml (that's 17,856 files or
> > so?) in favour of
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml:
> 1 ) We should
> 1a) deprecate the tag in metadata.xml (that's 17,856 files or
> so?) in favour of
> 1b) a conversion to their respective tags
> 1c) where the tag serves th
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:45:49 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let's keep it short: I think herds don't serve any special purpose
> nowadays. Their existence is mostly resulting in lack of consistency
> and inconveniences.
On IRC we seem to have found some consensus about metadata.xml:
1 )
17 matches
Mail list logo
