On 12/15/19 5:31 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Without more information, all I can say is that there's probably a
better way to do whatever these users are doing that doesn't involve
modifying a system user. But regardless, Michał's answer is the right
one if you decide that you do want to modify
On 12/14/19 5:02 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> acct-* shouldn't mess with already *existing* users. So upgrade
> experience shouldn't be affected...
Even on upgrades, pkg_postinst() in acct-user.eclass will update the
home directory, shell, groups, and comment field.
Without more information
On 2019-12-14 21:47, The Bit Pit wrote:
> acct-user/mythtv modifies the existing user if that user is not logged
> in. Mythtv has been around for years and users have created specialized
> configurations for the mythtv user. They do not like changes to the
> mythtv user when upgrading.
Could you p
On Sat, 2019-12-14 at 14:47 -0600, The Bit Pit wrote:
> acct-user/mythtv modifies the existing user if that user is not logged
> in. Mythtv has been around for years and users have created specialized
> configurations for the mythtv user. They do not like changes to the
> mythtv user when upgrad
acct-user/mythtv modifies the existing user if that user is not logged
in. Mythtv has been around for years and users have created specialized
configurations for the mythtv user. They do not like changes to the
mythtv user when upgrading.
A couple of solutions:
1)
the ebuild does not depend o
