On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 09:06 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> These are the things that I see argued about often; do you try to add
> tons of packages? Do you try to remove packages? Do you try to keep a
> balance. Why does the tree contain unmaintained and broken packages?
> Why does no (developer)
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I think people are leaving because a lack of direction.
I also agree here, but only to an extent.
To quantify my earlier statement. There is no ability to say 'this is
something Gentoo should dedicate resources to' vs. 'this is something
that is outside the scope o
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:05 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I don't think this is the reason people are leaving.
Agreed.
> I think people are leaving because a lack of direction.
I also agree here, but only to an extent.
> I am not aware of any goal Gentoo distribution wish to acquire. For
> examp
Alexandre Buisse a écrit :
[snip]
My experience is limited to the gnome packages and just based on those,
your proposal is already not doable.
Gnome deps on :
- core glib/gtk packages, used by many other packages, including
"server" packages, but "owned" by the gnome herd
- dbus/hal, handled
On 4/10/07, Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
as everyone probably noticed, there is a current atmosphere of sinking ship,
with quite a lot of people leaving and many agreeing that gentoo is no fun
working on anymore. Before it's too late, I'd like to propose a big reforma
