Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-build/bazel, sci-libs/keras, sci-libs/tensorflow, sci-libs/tensorflow-estimator, sci-visualization/tensorboard

2024-01-18 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:33:08PM +0100, Maciej Barć wrote: > A lot of Bazel bugs were just left to rot, even though they are invalid. > There are work from users to get Bazel to a reasonable state, see: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/918703 (plus comment #1) > > > # Unmasking this requires a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-build/bazel, sci-libs/keras, sci-libs/tensorflow, sci-libs/tensorflow-estimator, sci-visualization/tensorboard

2024-01-18 Thread David Seifert
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 14:33 +0100, Maciej Barć wrote: > A lot of Bazel bugs were just left to rot, even though they are > invalid. > There are work from users to get Bazel to a reasonable state, see: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/918703 (plus comment #1) > > > # Unmasking this requires a sign-off

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-build/bazel, sci-libs/keras, sci-libs/tensorflow, sci-libs/tensorflow-estimator, sci-visualization/tensorboard

2024-01-18 Thread Maciej Barć
A lot of Bazel bugs were just left to rot, even though they are invalid. There are work from users to get Bazel to a reasonable state, see: https://bugs.gentoo.org/918703 (plus comment #1) # Unmasking this requires a sign-off from QA and treecleaners, since # these packages require a ton of