On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:33:08PM +0100, Maciej Barć wrote:
> A lot of Bazel bugs were just left to rot, even though they are invalid.
> There are work from users to get Bazel to a reasonable state, see:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/918703 (plus comment #1)
>
> > # Unmasking this requires a
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 14:33 +0100, Maciej Barć wrote:
> A lot of Bazel bugs were just left to rot, even though they are
> invalid.
> There are work from users to get Bazel to a reasonable state, see:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/918703 (plus comment #1)
>
> > # Unmasking this requires a sign-off
A lot of Bazel bugs were just left to rot, even though they are invalid.
There are work from users to get Bazel to a reasonable state, see:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/918703 (plus comment #1)
# Unmasking this requires a sign-off from QA and treecleaners, since
# these packages require a ton of