On 05/30/14 10:05, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Nothing at all, but I don't see a generic global SSL USE_EXPAND adding
any particular benefit, either. What are the intended benefits to
this, besides aesthetics??
Take a look at bug #510974. Because USE=ssl means different things on
different packa
Peter Stuge:
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> If a user has i.e. SSL="polarssl" in make.conf and emerges things that
>> don't have polarssl on their list, then those things won't have SSL
>> support at all, right?
>
> Wrong; I would expect emerge to throw an error at me and exit, rather
> than to fail
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> If a user has i.e. SSL="polarssl" in make.conf and emerges things that
> don't have polarssl on their list, then those things won't have SSL
> support at all, right?
Wrong; I would expect emerge to throw an error at me and exit, rather
than to fail (build the package with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/05/14 08:03 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 05/29/14 23:21, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> USE_EXPAND generally works or is meant to work when all
>> participating ebuilds are ok with working from the exact same set
>> of flags.
>
> Not at all.
On 05/29/14 23:21, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Sorry for the possible HTML email, this is from my phone..
On May 29, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 29 May 2014 13:42:01 -0400 as excerpted:
With the number of ssl providers growing, like l
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Thu, 29 May 2014 23:21:47 -0400 as excerpted:
> USE_EXPAND generally works or is meant to work when all participating
> ebuilds are ok with working from the exact same set of flags. The only
> case I can think of otherwise right now is PYTHON_TARGETS, and even then
> it
Sorry for the possible HTML email, this is from my phone..
> On May 29, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 29 May 2014 13:42:01 -0400 as excerpted:
>
>> With the number of ssl providers growing, like libressl, and with issues
>> like bu
Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 29 May 2014 13:42:01 -0400 as excerpted:
> With the number of ssl providers growing, like libressl, and with issues
> like bug #510974, I think its time we consider making this a uniform way
> of dealing with ssl providers in gentoo. We would proceed something
> l
