Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 2:07 PM, Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current state: Deferred
Wanted state: Accepted/Implemented (at least by me)
The GLEP should be updated. Motivation section does not seem to
justify the changes. IMO Meatoo [1] (and its hipothetical
Alistair Bush wrote:
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Current state: Deferred
Wanted state: Accepted/Implemented (at least by me)
Open questions from last discussion (March 2006):
- Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one maintainer
entry?
Yes
- Is recording an
On Jan 19, 2008 4:13 PM, Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibilities:
An element: status{active/inactive}/status
Status of what? seeing you have proposed a upstream-status and a
maintainer status. what else is there left to status :P
There will be a maintainer tag within
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 2:07 PM, Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your oppinion?
Would this be the right time to discuss about moving other variables
to metadata.xml ? How about HOMEPAGE, DESCRIPTION and LICENSE ? Those
I'd rather like to see it in a new thread since it
Mark Loeser wrote:
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Current state: Deferred
Wanted state: Accepted/Implemented (at least by me)
Yea, this sounds like a good thing from reading over the GLEP, unless
I'm missing some glaring problems with it.
Open questions from last discussion
