Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-10 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:18:52 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm also going to rename the test flag to regression-test or

[gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm also going to rename the test flag to regression-test or something similar to get it out of FEATURES=test control. The testsuite is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-01 Thread Kent Fredric
2 other classes of tests you may want to consider : - network/internet accessibility required tests - markers for tests that are known/expected to fail under many conditions and are not worth end-user-testing, but end-users can force-running any way if they really want to see the individual

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 01 May 2013 21:24:07 Kent Fredric wrote: please do not top post -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-01 Thread Kent Fredric
On 2 May 2013 16:21, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 01 May 2013 21:24:07 Kent Fredric wrote: please do not top post -mike My apologies, Gmail has forced upon us this new message composer, and it sucks, it actively discourages bottom posting, and I'm stuck with it. I