[gentoo-dev] Re: Major changes to gdesklets.eclass

2010-02-08 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Joe Sapp : > Thanks for looking at this Christian. Sorry for the late reply. > Patch to the original revision is attached. I am fine with it. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Major changes to gdesklets.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Joe Sapp
Thanks for looking at this Christian. On 12/29/2009 03:54 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Looks fine so far. What puzzled me is the documentation of the SLOT > variable. What is the motivation to do so? It would be possible for two different versions of a Control to be installed and work wit

[gentoo-dev] Re: Major changes to gdesklets.eclass

2009-12-29 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Joe Sapp : > Anyways, a diff would be useless so I've attached the proposed eclass > [2]. Looks fine so far. What puzzled me is the documentation of the SLOT variable. What is the motivation to do so? * Sometimes you give a default on undefined ROOT variable, sometimes not. Please make