Tom Wijsman posted on Thu, 02 May 2013 07:09:10 +0200 as excerpted:
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> After some early issues with "too much magic" re preserved-libs
>
> Why is it magic? It is well explained what it does (eg. man make.conf).
>
>> I originally would rather let the upgr
On Thu, 2 May 2013 03:38:24 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> After some early issues with "too much magic" re preserved-libs
Why is it magic? It is well explained what it does (eg. man make.conf).
> I originally would rather let the upgrades happen as
> they always did and simp
Zac Medico posted on Wed, 01 May 2013 08:01:45 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 05/01/2013 07:46 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> I think it is time to consider enabling [preserve-libs] by default.
>> Hopefully any ABI bumps will be accompanied by a
>> subslot / slot-operator migration at this point.
>
> Yeah
On 05/01/2013 02:07 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Zac,
>
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>>> The most annoying fact is, that none of this would have been necessary
>>> with portage 2.2, but maybe we have to wait for 2.1.11.500 before 2.2
>>> gets
Hi Zac,
Zac Medico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> The most annoying fact is, that none of this would have been necessary
>> with portage 2.2, but maybe we have to wait for 2.1.11.500 before 2.2
>> gets stable...
>
> Since portage-2.1.11.20 [1], you can do th
