On 2022-09-07 17:36, John Helmert III wrote:
If you find a security issue, please file a security bug. I'm not
really sure what the security impact of this is, though.
I'm not sure if this is a security issue per se (which is why I
described it as security-related), here - the default configu
On 2022-09-07 17:29, Mike Gilbert wrote:
A virtual seems a bit pointless for the following reasons:
[...]
> 2. dbus-broker[launcher] utilizes config files installed by dbus, and
> actually RDEPENDs on sys-apps/dbus for that reason.
Yeah, I failed at reading - even the README of dbus-broker cle
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Marek Szuba wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
> I wonder if we should create a virtual package to allow our users - or
> at least those who run systemd anyway - to choose between sys-apps/dbus
> and sys-apps/dbus-broken as D-Bus implementation for their systems.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:56 AM Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> Dear everyone,
>
> I wonder if we should create a virtual package to allow our users - or
> at least those who run systemd anyway - to choose between sys-apps/dbus
> and sys-apps/dbus-broken as D-Bus implementation for their systems. The
> usu
