Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?

2006-06-21 Thread Dan Meltzer
On 6/21/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:03:21 -0400: > [Stefan Schweizer wrote...] >> qt3 - enable optional qt3 support >> qt4 - enable optional qt4 support > > Maybe I just need a little

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?

2006-06-21 Thread Duncan
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:03:21 -0400: > [Stefan Schweizer wrote...] >> qt3 - enable optional qt3 support >> qt4 - enable optional qt4 support > > Maybe I just need a little time to warm up to this. :) This seems simples

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?

2006-06-21 Thread Caleb Tennis
> qt - GLOBAL use flag that causes the package to build against the good > version > for that package. > > qt3, qt4... - LOCAL use flags to build against specific versions of > qt when it makes sense on a per-package basis and when it's deemed to > be reasonable by the package maintainer. Easy to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?

2006-06-21 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Carsten Lohrke wrote: On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote: qt3 and qt4 is being used there already and it is obvious It's "nice" to invent new use flags affecting Qt stuff without contacting those who care for Qt. 2) A package requires either Qt3 or