If qt5 is set as a USE flag, it should be preferred over a qt4 USE flag.
The use explicitly opted in.
Also, most software that does run with Qt5 runs better with Qt5, and
supports numerous features such as better HighDPI support.
On 9 March 2015 at 04:17, Johannes Huber j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015, 21:50:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both
Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015, 21:50:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4 qt5.
Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs
