On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Now git has some/all of the needed features, and people wait on a future
potential git migration instead of figuring out the important bits now
(a good part of that is defined in GLEP 63, but there's no action apart
from
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:09:26 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you saying that git is inefficient with large projects? It
was developed with efficiency in mind in the first place. And
kernel guys
On 06/11/2014 12:10 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
But, for the most part we just need to get the back-end re-written to
work with a git repo. Actually migrating the tree itself to git is
largely a solved problem.
Weren't we also waiting for some gpg signing stuff to land?
That's completely
Ryan Hill posted on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:10:07 -0600 as excerpted:
[On switching the gentoo tree to git.]
Weren't we also waiting for some gpg signing stuff to land?
At one point, yes, but AFAIK, that was actually resolved some time ago
(a year, two?) now.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred.
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org writes:
Perhaps we could consider GitLab?
+1 on that. I have deployed it recently at work and it seems to perform
well. *Really* easy to use. Easy to deploy as well. It's written in
Ruby, *not Java*. It's possible to have a basic integartion with
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
We should focus on forcing people who were involved into OpenRC to
document what they know.
Uh, you can't force anybody to do anything, and most of them are no
longer around. You can always encourage or ask nicely.
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org writes:
Uh, you can't force anybody to do anything, and most of them are no
longer around. You can always encourage or ask nicely.
Yes, I meant that: forcing by asking nicely. :-)
You can also set a policy of no further commits accepted without
accompanying
Alexey Shvetsov ale...@gentoo.org writes:
However this will depend on migration of gentoo-x86 to git
Well, we can start evaluating gitlab for git overlays and gentoo hosted
projects, such as (back to topic :) OpenRC.
Is the infra team interested in this option?
pgpqPDX0LzcUz.pgp
Description:
All,
I attempted to post an update a bit earlier, but I haven't seen it yet,
so I thought I would try again.
Thanks to Daniel Robbins of funtoo, I am about to getGentoo installed on
another box, so I will be able to take the lead on OpenRC again. He
assisted me on Skype today with getting
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:14:34 -0500 as excerpted:
Daniel Robbins assisted me today with tweaking the bios of the box I
plan to put Gentoo on so that I can boot it from a cdrom. Also he
alerted me to this thread, so that is why I wanted to post this update.
He will also
On 06/09/2014 12:41 AM, hasufell wrote:
The amount of contributors (with real patches and real ebuilds) is
constantly decreasing, because our workflow is horrible. I hope you
don't actually think that bugzilla is an appropriate review platform.
The problem is finding improvements that everyone
В письме от 9 июня 2014 01:36:49 пользователь Michael Palimaka написал:
On 06/09/2014 12:41 AM, hasufell wrote:
The amount of contributors (with real patches and real ebuilds) is
constantly decreasing, because our workflow is horrible. I hope you
don't actually think that bugzilla is an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/06/14 18:38, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Perhaps we could consider GitLab?
Yep. Its better to have gitlab || gerrit || ReviewBoard Personaly
i have only expirience with gerrit
However this will depend on migration of gentoo-x86 to git
I
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 07 Jun 2014 20:19:20 +0200 as excerpted:
The OpenRC project appears less active these days than it used to be.
There are many commits per month the last years, but the amount of
commits in 2014 per month has noticeably decreased to a crawl [1].
Alongside that,
14 matches
Mail list logo
