Le samedi 04 décembre 2010 à 09:32 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit :
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:46:37 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:25:21 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a
Le samedi 04 décembre 2010 à 09:32 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit :
Well, if we're to commonize out some code, I'd suggest starting with
scons_clean_makeopts() from scons-utils.eclass -- it's pretty
*readable*
and working variant of MAKEOPTS cleaning, in pure bash.
maybe it should be moved to
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:46:37 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:25:21 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a
écrit :
I had a issue with waf, with that MAKEOPTS thing [1]
Maybe
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 06:02, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:29:45 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 19.46 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
This has come up enough times that we should write some common code.
Or
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:25:21 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le vendredi 03 décembre 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Cyprien Nicolas a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 21:25, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please also find in these patches a proposal of a waf-utils eclass
Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 19.46 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
This has come up enough times that we should write some common code.
Or resume the idea to simply provide a separate variable for
number-of-jobs rather than relying purely on MAKEOPTS.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:29:45 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 19.46 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
This has come up enough times that we should write some common code.
Or resume the idea to simply provide a separate variable for
