Le 26/02/2011 17:08, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
> I could imagine a way like that:
[...]
Or we can do it like distributions always do (at least we do) :
1) find packages that don't work out of the box with libpng 1.5
2) work with upstream to fix them
Really, libpng15 is to libpng14 what gtk3 is to
* Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
> What I had in mind was something that would work for upstreams as well,
> mostly by having fallback; so if a package supported up to libpng 1.4 it
> would search for -lpng14, then -lpng12, then -lpng (and in Gentoo would
> hit -lpng14); while one supporting 1.5 as
* Enrico Weigelt schrieb:
> > pretty please force every consumer to hardcode the version
> > because i know people that want to do this" ?
>
> No, they should use pkg-config at buildtime and do the version
> selection there (eg. the eselect-way).
Oh, it gets a bit tricker: the dependencies of t
On 02/24/2011 05:26 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> And it's exactly what I'm going to fix in OSS-QM when I'm adding
> libpng-1.5 in a few days.
not this oss-qm again... not sure how to put "nobody cares" politely
* Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > so why dont you ask the libpng upstream people ?
>
> ask what ?
> "pretty please dont install libpng.pc/.so,
Exactly that.
And it's exactly what I'm going to fix in OSS-QM when I'm adding
libpng-1.5 in a few days.
> pretty please force every consumer to hardcode
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:37:27 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Have you thought about doing something like what was done for wxwidgets ?
>
> - an eselect module for out of portage builds
> - an eclass creating symlinks for libpng.pc/.so in $T and setting the correct
> -L flag for the linker and PKG
On Monday, February 14, 2011 10:37:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Saturday, February 12, 2011 11:37:29 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Il giorno sab, 12/02/2011 alle 18.21 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> > > patching packages in the tree is a huge hassle,
> > > you add hassle to end users who d
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 11:37:29 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 12/02/2011 alle 18.21 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> > patching packages in the tree is a huge hassle,
> > you add hassle to end users who d/l random packages and try to build
> > things
> > themselves, and y
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 21:37:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 12/02/2011 alle 18.21 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> > patching packages in the tree is a huge hassle,
> > you add hassle to end users who d/l random packages and try to build
> > things
> > themselves, and you
Il giorno sab, 12/02/2011 alle 18.21 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> patching packages in the tree is a huge hassle,
> you add hassle to end users who d/l random packages and try to build
> things
> themselves, and you make Gentoo non-standard wrt every other distro
> out there.
What I had
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 18:31:12 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/13/2011 01:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday, February 11, 2011 11:49:43 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 02/11/2011 06:38 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >>> 4) What have we learned from libpng 1.2 -> 1.4 upgrade? I'
On 02/13/2011 01:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2011 11:49:43 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/11/2011 06:38 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
4) What have we learned from libpng 1.2 -> 1.4 upgrade? I'd just like to
be better informed.
[...]
We have been discussing about remov
On Friday, February 11, 2011 08:44:04 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 18:33:32 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Friday, February 11, 2011 05:07:50 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > > Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
> > > > you are seriously
On Friday, February 11, 2011 18:33:32 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 05:07:50 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
> > > you are seriously considering patching every single package using
> > > libpng like
> > >
On Friday, February 11, 2011 05:07:50 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
> > you are seriously considering patching every single package using
> > libpng like
> > this instead of fixing those that fail??? (and i'm not talking about
Matt Turner posted on Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:39:04 + as excerpted:
> I'm a little unclear about -lpng vs -lpng15. ssuominen tells me on IRC
> that probably 90% of packages linking with libpng will fail with 1.5.
> These 90% will link with -lpng until a version that supports 1.5 is
> released? The
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
>>
>> you are seriously considering patching every single package using
>> libpng like
>> this instead of fixing those that fail??? (and i'm not talking about
>> the
Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
>
> you are seriously considering patching every single package using
> libpng like
> this instead of fixing those that fail??? (and i'm not talking about
> the fact
> that these patches cannot be upstreamed...)
Why not? We
Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 17.38 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." ha
scritto:
> 1) Are we going to have a tinderbox run *before* libpng-1.5 gets keyworded?
Absolutely.
> 2) If the upgrade is non-trivial, i.e. just emerge -uDNa world and
> revdep-rebuild isn't going to fix it, will we have an upgrad
19 matches
Mail list logo
