[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc: oldnet vs newnet

2010-09-20 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:07:44 -0500 as excerpted: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:52:23AM -0700, Joshua Saddler wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc: oldnet vs newnet

2010-09-20 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:22:59AM +, Duncan wrote: Keeping oldnet the default and only documented method, does seem to be the most pragmatic/practical solution. Given nightmorph's indication that he's not interested in redoing the docs twice, or documenting both methods, that does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc: oldnet vs newnet

2010-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, September 20, 2010 23:03:54 William Hubbs wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:22:59AM +, Duncan wrote: Finally, I'm not sure it absolutely needs it, but for clarity-sake and to avoid second-guessing and debate continuing long past the point of usefulness, I believe a council

[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc: oldnet vs newnet

2010-09-20 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:03:54 -0500 as excerpted: [ Duncan wrote...] However, if we keep newnet around as a masked USE flag until it's no longer worth continuing, it'll give people already using it time to switch back, and/or to build up their own site scripts as